Build
- QA strategy, test architecture, and STLC
- Framework design and modernization
- Quality practices tailored to your product and team
Interactive QA Experience
Some bugs are good at hiding.
Your product grows. Your users change. Bugs find new places to hide. BetterChecks combines human expertise with AI-powered testing to catch them before your customers ever do.
1describe("Release gate", () => {
2test("total is correct", async () => {
3const cart = await openCart();
4await cart.add(PRO_PLAN);
5expect(cart.total).toBe(49.0);
6});
7});
✓Guest checkout · 3 browsers1.2s
✓Payment API contract · 2000.4s
✓Visual regression · 24 pages2.1s
✓Load test · 1k users1.7s
Move your cursor here to start the hunt
expect(bug).toBeCaught() ✓
Not another testing agency.Your product deserves more than a random match from a QA talent pool.
Automate
- AI-assisted test creation and maintenance
- UI, API, and end-to-end automation
- Intelligent regression and visual testing
Validate
- Functional and integration testing
- Performance and security testing
- Mobile, accessibility, and critical business-flow testing
Evolve
- CI/CD quality gates and continuous testing
- AI application evaluation
- Quality insights and ongoing QA improvement
AI Automation Framework
Building Next-Gen AI Apps? We make them reliable for your users.
From hallucination detection to agent behavior and AI security, BetterChecks brings the experts, AI agents, and tailored evaluation frameworks to help you release AI your customers can trust.
Know your answers are right
- Checks every reply for accuracy
- Catches made-up facts
- Confirms it follows your rules
Trust your AI agents
- Confirms tasks get finished
- Checks the right tools are used
- Spots broken steps early
Keep users and data safe
- Blocks prompt tricks and attacks
- Stops private data leaking
- Flags biased or harmful replies
Release without worry
- Runs automatically on every release
- Plain-English quality reports
- Tracks quality over time
- Compare AI models
- Test before each release
- Catch regressions early
- Monitor live quality
- Prove it's safe
- DeepEval
- Ragas
- Promptfoo
- LLM-as-a-Judge
- Custom checks
What we verify
We test every corner of your app.
Our toolkit
The right tools for every layer of quality.
We work with the open-source and industry-standard tools your team already trusts, across testing, security, performance, AI evaluation and delivery.
- PlaywrightAutomation Testing
- SnykSecurity Testing
- JenkinsCI/CD
- TestRailTest Case Management
- k6Performance Testing
- DatadogObservability and Monitoring
- SeleniumAutomation Testing
- LangSmithLLM and AI Agent Evaluation
- JiraProject Management
- Allure ReportTest Reporting
- OWASP ZAPSecurity Testing
- GitHub ActionsCI/CD
- CypressAutomation Testing
- Apache JMeterPerformance Testing
- PrometheusObservability and Monitoring
- GrafanaObservability and Monitoring
- PromptfooLLM Evaluation and Red Teaming
- DeepEvalLLM Evaluation
- TestMu AIAI Test Cloud
- MLflowML and GenAI Tracking
- KubernetesContainer Orchestration
- AppiumMobile Automation
- MaestroMobile UI Testing
- CucumberBDD Testing
- Sauce LabsCross-Browser Cloud
Why BetterChecks?
Engineering quality, not just test execution.
BetterChecks brings senior QA expertise, automation engineering, and AI-assisted workflows together so quality can keep pace with product development.
Traditional
Plan
Build
Test
Release
Bug found late
BetterChecks
Plan
Build
Test
Release
Risk caught early
- Traditional testing approachTesting mainly at the end of developmentThe BetterChecks approachQuality practices integrated throughout the SDLC
- Traditional testing approachManual-heavy, repetitive executionThe BetterChecks approachAutomation-first, with human judgment where it matters
- Traditional testing approachGeneric framework applied to every productThe BetterChecks approachFramework and strategy tailored to product risks
- Traditional testing approachTest volume as the main measureThe BetterChecks approachRelevant coverage, risk reduction, and actionable signals
- Traditional testing approachReports failures after they happenThe BetterChecks approachHelps teams detect risks earlier and improve prevention
- Traditional testing approachTools without a joined-up QA strategyThe BetterChecks approachConsulting, implementation, and execution working together
- Traditional testing approachAI used as a black boxThe BetterChecks approachAI-assisted workflows with engineering review and accountability
AI gives us leverage.
Senior engineers give you judgment.
FAQ
Buying Questions
Still have a question? Talk to someone who has tested products like yours.
Yes. We can complement your team with specialist expertise, help establish practices and frameworks, or take responsibility for an agreed scope of QA work.
No. We first assess your current setup and recommend whether to extend, improve, or replace parts of it. We aim to avoid unnecessary rewrites.
Yes. We can collaborate through your existing development workflow, including pull requests, issue trackers, test reviews, and CI/CD pipelines.
No. Depending on your needs, we can help with strategy, architecture, framework development, automation, testing, CI/CD quality gates, and continuous improvement.
We can assess integrations with tools such as Jira, Azure DevOps, BrowserStack Test Management, source control, and CI/CD systems. The exact approach depends on your current setup and access.
Yes. Scope can include LLM evaluation, RAG evaluation, agent workflow testing, performance testing, and safety or adversarial testing.
We agree on data access, approved tools, and handling requirements before work begins. The specific controls depend on the engagement and environment; we will document the agreed approach rather than make blanket security claims.
Repository ownership, access, and handover arrangements are agreed at the start of the engagement. We aim to make deliverables usable and maintainable by your team.
Yes. We can help connect suitable automated checks to your pipeline and define quality gates based on your release risks and workflow.
Timing depends on scope, product complexity, access, and the state of your current test assets. After an initial discussion, we can recommend a practical first milestone.
Start a Conversation
What’s slowing your engineering team down?
Is regression taking too long? Is manual testing holding back releases? Is automation difficult to maintain? Or are you struggling to evaluate AI features with confidence?
Let’s identify the biggest quality bottleneck and discuss a practical way forward.
Start with a conversation about your product, your risks, and where better quality engineering could make the biggest difference.